Search results

I am not obsessed...you are over-reacting. I have only ever mentioned it once, and you claim no one else has mentioned it before...So, having to explain its "real" meaning..."numerous" times as you claim is therefore provably false. I also made no commentary about your quote whatsoever...

Dunno........are you preparing to engage in a war of words...about the topic of "wars of words"? :tongue3:

Anyone who would believe the statement that the "British reaction" (acc. British media) could ever have been described as one of "openness"....is delusional already.....There was never a sense of "openness". The article has already demonstrated its uselessness.

Agreed. :wavey::thumbsup:

Yeah...."Pilgrim's Progress" is a must. I think no work of Christian Literature has or ever will top it. Bunyan's other book "The Holy War" was pretty good to.

Yes........

I have been a "dispensationalist" all my life...I have never even run across a creature like you describe here...Perhaps where I am from things are radically different. Maybe it is the type you describe here which makes some people appear to utterly cringe in horror at the very term...

Don't you think we've been keeping OR and Icon in the dark long enough? Games up now guys: We should go ahead and forward them the memo....Truth is, we haven't been "Parentheses-Church" adherents for a while....we are now the "Bracket-People" {} <----- and have been for some years. We didn't...

This is simply stupid OR...wake up and grow up.

Yeshua, don't attempt to explain or correct them about dispensationalism....They want nothing to do with it. There is a reasoned, intelligent and informed "non-dispy" who might actually furnish a reasonable debate on this topic....His screen-name is "AsteriskTom". I disagree with him about a...

I am not sure what "ROFG" means....I am trying to be somewhat charitable in what I perceive to be direct insults upon my wife. I love my wife KY. Will you please stop tacitly insulting her? There will come a point that I am no longer capable of abiding certain dispersions upon her or her...

I am both rightly and wrongly accused of many things..."dancing" around an issue is NEVER one of them. I make rather bald assertions OR...I don't "dance" around anything...you are either confused or lying.

You can think of me...whatever you want....my beloved wife is not to be dragged out and insulted....This is trash KY...leave her out of it. She does not engage in debates such as this one. You may say to ME what you will, do not trash, denigrate or insult her..That is lower than low.

You do not understand what a "straw-man" is Icon.....I promise you, as I have OR...you guys will have odious and obnoxious amounts of fun trashing positions no one will defend....while you preach to choirs...I await anyone to defend the position of "dispensationalism" as OR has described...

I don't understand your objection..."Almighty" and "Omnipotent" are considered to be synonymous usually. Accept that there will always be certain "godless" who will refuse to believe that 2+2=4 if it would require a belief in God. They don't WANT to learn....Thus, they never will. They have...

You are going to debate with yourself OR....watch.......:sleep:

Yes, you have indeed: Personally, having already recognized your having quoted them devoid of context, I already (in my extensive, if not infinite) foreknowledge....supplied the qualifier: You are now hoping someone will defend the positions you ascribe to "dispensationalists". There...

Well, if this is how you are defining "Dispensationalism" then, you already win, as no one agrees with the contentions about dispensationalism that you present. This will be a short thread. No one claims what you are suggesting "dispensationalism" entails or believes. You may not have...