Search results

That horse is pretty tired. (BTW: Zaac has me on ignore, so he won't see this)

When is the shepherd not responsible for his flock? (in other words, I see what you're saying, and agree)

Prediction: FollowtheWay and CTB won't respond to this thread.

Why do you blame just the republicans?

Motes and beams.

My comments about your ignorance are based directly off of your posted statements, which show an ignorance of how the ACA was going to be funded through the appropriations bill that funded the entire government. That's what this back-and-forth between Dems, Reps, and the prez has been about for...

Do you really believe we will fully default? I fully expect that there will be an "eleventh-hour miracle" (either the Republicans or the Democrats deciding it's not worth the fight, or both sides coming to an agreement). And if we do default, don't you think they'll be (or should be) like most...

Wow. Your ignorance of appropriations bills is overwhelming.

Why are you responding to CTB?!? CTB says in one post that he has no credit rating, he doesn't borrow, he doesn't like the thought of borrowing for anything that depreciates in value, and "if a person is responsible and pays their bills on time"...and then turns around and says we should...

I'm thinking FollowTheWay and CTB will not respond to this thread. When even Jon Stewart questions a liberal plan, people should sit back and ask why....

Please educate us. What changes to the ACA did the Republicans make that substantially flawed the original that Pelosi said we didn't know what was in it, that we would have to pass the bill to find out what was in the bill?

Poncho isn't. That's why he followed those words with "Today we have tyranny."

Please, by all means, share how the ACA has saved lives. I also encourage you to check out the San Jose news where supporters of the ACA received mail today informing them how much their insurance premiums have sky-rocketed (one ACA supporter stated that his has jumped to $10,000 a year)...

Not aware of any terrible consequences? How about Massacbusetts' elected officials complaining of the rising costs; and predicting that if they can't figure something out, by 2020 medical care will constitute 50% of their state budget, which means only 50% of the budget to meet ALL the other...

So what you just said is that the federal government has no reponsibility to enforce its own laws. The Department of Justice has the responsibility to enforce federal laws; and it falls under the executive branch of government. So yes, the executive branch DOES have responsibility to defend...

DOMA section 3 was legal and law until 2013; but in 2011, the Obama administration decided not to defend it in court. For two years, the executive branch did not fulfill their duty to uphold federal law. What say you?

Um...because it isn't working the way it was sold to us? If you buy a truck because you were told it had 4-wheel drive and you really need something with 4-wheel drive, and you find out just as you're buying it that it doesn't have 4-wheel drive, and by the way, it's going to cost more than...

Is he standing up for HIS principles, or is he working for the people of his country?

You failed to address anything I actually said. Why is it that if the president exempts certain parts of a law, it's okay; but if House Republicans try to do it, it's "cherry picking" and wrong? Further, it's COMPLETELY within the rights of the House to determine areas for which to...

You're kidding, right? You're seriously not aware that Obama granted a one-year extension of the ACA to businesses, but won't consider doing so for individuals--the people who could actually use that year to ensure they're getting the right plans and actually savng money? Negative. The game...