Barry Johnson
Well-Known Member
Thats what we read .Hardly. Talk about begging the question!
The Archangel
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Thats what we read .Hardly. Talk about begging the question!
The Archangel
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Thats what we read .
Except for Ruth ... and Rahab's family ... and the servants of Jacob that bore the tribes of Israel ... and the Servants of Abram that followed him and became the tribe of Jacob and the slaves in Egypt ... and the wives of Joseph that bore two half-tribes ... and the Samaritans.
Spare me your contra-biblical nonsense.
Now you are just talking like a crazy person ... "works mind set" of TULIP ????Those He predestined for future Adoption ( To be conformed ) Eternal security, not the works mind set of the P in TULIP ,trap .
Foreknew ,( we aAnd we know that God causes all things to work together for good to those who love God, to those who are called according to [His] purpose. For those whom He foreknew, He also predestined [to become] conformed to the image of His Son, so that He would be the firstborn among many brethren; and these whom He predestined, He also called; and these whom He called, He also justified; and these whom He justified, He also glorified. [Romans 8:28-30 NASB]
I have:
Does that make the Apostle Paul a "Hindu Gnostic"?
- called according to [His] purpose
- THOSE WHOM HE foreknew = predestined = called = justified = glorified
- therefore "foreknew" = "glorified"
- foreknew and predestined = aka. "elected"
- justified and glorified = aka. "saved"
- glorified = conformed to the image of His Son
- Q.E.D. "elected to be saved" = "predestined to become conformed to the image of His Son"
We are 'known' at conversion . Gal 4 .9Now you are just talking like a crazy person ... "works mind set" of TULIP ????
The (T) stands for TOTAL INABILITY, so "works" and "TULIP" are opposite ends of the spectrum.
WE were predestined to be conformed to the image of Christ. This "predestination" came AFTER God "foreknew" (relational knowledge, not intellectual knowledge ... knew us, not knew about us) and BEFORE God "called", "justified" and "glorified" us.
I said I believe Predestination to future Guaranteed Adoption / inheritance/ Conformed After Conversion is Eternal security . Its Guarenteed for the believer who is blessed with all spiritual blessings in heavenly places in Christ: ( Eph 1)Now you are just talking like a crazy person ... "works mind set" of TULIP ????
The (T) stands for TOTAL INABILITY, so "works" and "TULIP" are opposite ends of the spectrum.
WE were predestined to be conformed to the image of Christ. This "predestination" came AFTER God "foreknew" (relational knowledge, not intellectual knowledge ... knew us, not knew about us) and BEFORE God "called", "justified" and "glorified" us.
I is just ignorant and has to trust ...Lineage is figured through the man. atpollard. Rahab was spared while her family were dying around her. Israel was not on an evangelistic campaign to Jericho. You really do not have any of this figured out, do you?
that faith and the word are the means of salvation.
.
Then just explain this to me ...I said I believe Predestination to future Guaranteed Adoption / inheritance/ Conformed After Conversion is Eternal security .
That disqualifies Jesus from the throne of David.Lineage is figured through the man.
But the Pharisees heard it and killed Christ instead. Your ducks are not in order.This is one of the worst arguments you guys make. The word provides faith in the salvation that has already been provided. That according to scripture Romans 10:17
You misuse the word "means" to make a false assertion. The means is the finished work of Christ on the cross. The work in mens hearts has nothing to do with the means of salvation.
But the Pharisees heard it and killed Christ instead. Your ducks are not in order.
Only the born-again can believe the gospel. It's beyond the grasp of everyone else.Pink elephants like purple houses.
Rahab was spared while her family were dying around her.
The problem is You and the Pharisees are cut from the same cloth. If you think you choose Christ and save yourself you are still lost as they ever were. If God saves you, you cannot help but believe and rejoice, bearing the fruit of the Holy Spirit.You two are determined to go at it, but you are not in disagreement.
You both advocate MONERGISM and salvation being 100% of God and 0% of man.
You are misunderstanding each other.
Not that it matters a great deal, but I do not think that this is factually accurate.How the 5 points of Calvinism don’t line up.
The 5 points lined up originally since Calvin taught universal atonement. This made faith and the word the means of salvation.
But Dort. Removed universal atonement and made Christ’s shed blood, limited to the elect, the means of salvation. This means the blood saves from eternity, even infants, and those elect beyond the reach of the gospel.
Thanks for sharing your wisdom in this matter.Not that it matters a great deal, but I do not think that this is factually accurate.
My understanding is that there were no "5 points" in Jon Calvin's writings and by 5 point Calvinism standards Jon Calvin was only a 4-pointer.
The introduction of the concept of "5 points" comes from the Remonstrances (Classic Arminianism) written shortly after the death of Jacob Arminius. Only then did the Synod of Dort meet to create an official response to the Remonstrances and create the 5 points of "Calvinism".
The TULIP acronym did not come along until the 1800's (I think).
Your arguments are really directed more at General Baptist "universal atonement" vs Particular Baptist "limited atonement" and the consequences on sotieriology with respect to the absolute NEED to hear the Gospel in order to be saved. So the topic itself is still perfectly valid even if the opening may generate some confusion.
[As an aside, that is what happened with you and Revmitchell, he latched onto your universal atonement comment and strongly disagreed with it. Now you are arguing with him over it. Well guess what, YOU DON"T ACCEPT UNIVERSAL ATONEMENT EITHER!]
As my daughter would say ... "Stubborn, much?"
He died for all.
Only the born-again can believe the gospel. It's beyond the grasp of everyone else.