Search results

BINGO!!!! As well as a great portion of internet posters!:thumbs:

Well, due to a "senior moment", I find I am unable to recall an explanation I read or heard (see, don't even remember which--) re: this instance. Will be most happy to furnish said info IF I ever recall it!:BangHead::praying::sleep:

Basically all this says to me is that the PR man for Hitler (Goebbles, I think) had it right when he said (paraphrased); "Tell a lie big enough & long enough, and most people will believe it." Seems he was right! 1) It ain't murder, it's just the same as excising a "tumor" 2) It ain't a...

Well, McCain is not my first choice for the nomination, BUT I do respect him very highly for this decision!

Thank you for a good chuckle AND a little nostalgia!!

Straight from Oz - no one has claimed that it's new, just that it WAS not anywhere near as prevalent as today. Primarily because there was shame, (anybody remember this ole' victorian emotion?), and morals were a little more important than today. Now that is fact!!!!

emphasis mine Typical liberal response! "I can tell you what to do with your money/talents/time/etc/etc better than you." 1 Do you know---: implying that he does not????? 2 I suppose---- : you would do well to get some facts before "supposing"; do you have any? (Pertinent to this case, I...

Whilst I'm not a fan of either of these characters, I fail to see where congress has the authority to "INVESTIGATE" a religious broadcaster. What, if any, crimes are they accused of to warrent such? 'Pears to me to be just some more gov't meddling just cause they can. It's time congress...

Now this is the truth!!! Who do you think the "I'm owed----" groups vote for, AND really are taken for granted???? Other instances I'm sure, but this is the biggest single bloc (IMNSHO).

You will also notice that the left decries any mention of censorship as being just a "fundamentalist, or right-wing paranoia". It's daily becoming more & more PC to criticise any adherent of literal biblical teaching, and many of the comments on this board are evidence of such. 'Course there...

Now poncho, we are in 100% agreement on this!!!!

Nope! Why don't you reference it for us so we can see it?:thumbs:

If I did not consider Christ to be who and what He says He is, then there is no way on this green earth that I would claim to be a follower. To do so, would say of me, that I would follow a charlatan OR a madman. If Jesus is not who or what He claims to be, then there is no other choice except...

True, but it does demand suspension of trusting that God says what He wanted to say, the way He wanted to say it; and it strongly implies that God needs help in stating His case for creation to the "modern highly educated" man.

Hard to believe; a glimmer of common sense in a topsy-turvy society!!!

And back just as trains were becoming popular, and getting faster, some brilliant wag opined that they would kill off many people because it was common knowledge that a human could not survive above 60 MPH as they would be unable to breathe. Chicken Little is alive and well, just in different...

AMEN!!! How very true!!!

Which, if you will notice, is almost always from liberals. (OK, time for the little snippets and cutesy put-downs from these same folk! :BangHead: )

Hard to do, BUT when you decide that you don't have the answer, and that He alone can direct you, AND you relinquish control to Him, THEN you will feel a peace that "passes understanding" and can move on. Until then, nothing but chaos, confusion and misery. God bless you as you work thru this.

I am personally against such an arrangement, BUT I am a very private person by nature, so obviously this just "ain't my cup of tea"! However, I have had other men who seem to see me as their confessor(?) and will unload on me sometimes; totally unsolicited. I have no problem with this, in that...