When all else fails attack the person?No, orthodox Preterism has a very good grasp of things, it's YOU that is deaf, dumb, and blind in that department.
HankD
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
When all else fails attack the person?No, orthodox Preterism has a very good grasp of things, it's YOU that is deaf, dumb, and blind in that department.
When all else fails attack the person?
HankD
When was the second coming and the resurrection of the saints in Christ?No, orthodox Preterism has a very good grasp of things, maybe it's YOU that's cut yourself off from the marvelous fulfillments that are there for those with eyes to see and ears to hear.
Maybe because they said that His blood be upon us AND our children?As a people/nation then and today in their synagogues reject their predicted Messiah until the vail is removed from their eyes.
Not punishment but a glory to God of martyrdom for the name of Jesus
Partial pret is acceptably;e, but full blown is Heresy!There. Fixed. This is not the first such obtuse thread he's started that maligns a whole multitude of sincere Bible students down through the ages: I take it personally when he thoughtlessly groups us together as 'phony'.
Preterism...A Pox Upon Baptists & other denoms
Most of us believe that Jesus will return at the end of time for resurrection & judgment.Though scripture is our final authority church history documentation does have some value.
A few years ago Tom Asterisk and I looked at Early Church Fathers (ECF) writings. Tom was challenged to find an ECF (post AD70) who was full preterist. Tom made a claim for one author because he spoke of the sack of Jerusalem as the days of vengeance. On the other hand I found ECF who wrote before AD70, around AD70, eclipsing AD70 and after AD70 (some well after) who spoke in no uncertain terms of a FUTURE Second Coming.
There is NO historical evidence for a clear cut preterist view among the ECF.
ALL were futurists.
HankD
No, they were not. They were mocking the promises of God.The scoffers of 2 Peter 3:1-9 were doing just that. (Challenge Fulfilment Theology by history & the Scriptural record.)
What about "1000 years" do you find "indefinite?"an indefinite "millennium."
The days of vengeance were specifically prophesied by Jesus, & as you agree, were accomplished.
NONE of the Jews of the generation who rejected Jesus were alive in 135 AD so why should God punish them for their rejection of Jesus? Perhaps Hadrian had his own reasons.
Christians also suffered persecution from the Romans. What was that a punishment for?
Your aren't phony k - you know your not. I think he knows that too.There. Fixed. This is not the first such obtuse thread he's started that maligns a whole multitude of sincere Bible students down through the ages: I take it personally when he thoughtlessly groups us together as 'phony'.
Preterism...A Pox Upon Baptists & other denoms
Well, I didn't want to quote that passage.Maybe because they said that His blood be upon us AND our children?
Well you hold to a form of futurism. If Christ is to return at the end of time for resurrection and judgement then that is still a future event.Most of us believe that Jesus will return at the end of time for resurrection & judgment.
What is your definition of a "futurist?"
Yes down through the ages many many futurist theories have come forth. Personally I am a chialist (at very least).The BIG problem with futurism is that it cannot be tested by its fulfilment. That gives interpreters like Scofield & LaHaye plenty of scope for their imagination. The Tim & Jerry "Left Behind" books & films may be exciting for some, but they cannot be tested in the way valid prophecy should be. Deuteronomy 18:20-22
You can challenge Fulfilment Theology by history & the Scriptural record. The scoffers of 2 Peter 3:1-9 were doing just that. They soon suffered for their scoffing, their despising the long-suffering of God. Peter goes on to prophecy the final coming & NH&NE after an indefinite "millennium." We have the assurance of the fulfilment of that prophecy by the past fulfilments - the flood & the destruction.
Yea already occurred, but LONG before the Dome of the Rock. Again, it's such a simple hermeneutic to compare scripture with scripture and let it interpret itself:
15 When therefore ye see the abomination of desolation, which was spoken of through Daniel the prophet, standing in the holy place (let him that readeth understand),
16 then let them that are in Judaea flee unto the mountains: Mt 24
14 But when ye see the abomination of desolation standing where he ought not (let him that readeth understand), then let them that are in Judaea flee unto the mountains: Mk 13
20 But when ye see Jerusalem compassed with armies, then know that her desolation is at hand.
21 Then let them that are in Judaea flee unto the mountains; and let them that are in the midst of her depart out; and let not them that are in the country enter therein. Lk 21
When You See Jerusalem Surrounded.....
There. Fixed. This is not the first such obtuse thread he's started that maligns a whole multitude of sincere Bible students down through the ages: I take it personally when he thoughtlessly groups us together as 'phony'.
Preterism...A Pox Upon Baptists & other denoms
When was the second coming and the resurrection of the saints in Christ?
Partial pret is acceptably;e, but full blown is Heresy!
Your aren't phony k - you know your not. I think he knows that too.
HankD
Partial preterism is also false. Jesus said that IMMEDIATELY AFTER the great trib was ended, there'd be a great cosmological disturbance, during which He'd return. If the great trib has already happened, He's long overdue!
Simple truth is, it HASN'T yet happened, so partial pret is false.
Your aren't phony k - you know your not. I think he knows that too.
HankD
Full preterism is false. Partial preterism still views some future prophetic events yet to take place; namely the return of Christ.I believe preterism is false because the events preterists SAY have already occurred are completely absent from history. I await any preterist replies.
I think you need to read up on partial preterism. Respectfully speaking, I do not believe you understand it.Partial preterism is just-as-false, as jesus said there'd be a great cosmological disturbance IMMEDIATELY AFTER the great trib has ended, during which He shall return. So, I think it's quite-obvious the trib hasn't yet occurred, nor any of the other prophesied eschatological events.
The Greek for the two "shortlys" in Revelation as found in the KJV is "en tachos", which means "rapid movement or occurrence", not "soon", I am told by a neighbor proficient in Koine and modern Greek.. ("Tachycardia" means rapid heart beat.) That means, when the events begin, they'll come in rapid succession. And again, it's OBVIOUS those events have NOT yet happened!
Now, does that mean the Scriptures are wrong? Of course not. It means that some people's own interpretations of them are wrong. So far, the Bible las a 1.000 batting average of its prophecies being fulfilled exactly, and I have no doubt this percentage will continue as the rest are fulfilled, in GOD'S timing.